SwanSong

Moon Is Not There

The Moon Is Not There

There’s a famous Zen saying: "If a tree falls in the forest & nobody is there, does it make a sound?"

But there is still another thought-provoking zen saying which has become very popular because there’s the name of Albert Einstein got attached to it.

One day while taking a walk back home, Albert Einstein pointed to the moon and asked physicist Abraham Pais, "Do you really believe the moon is not there when you are not looking at it?".

While targeting Bohr’s Copenhagen interpretation, he was defending two fundamental principles that underpin our everyday experience: that physical objects exist as real things independent of observers, and that these objects have an independent existence regardless of whether anyone is observing them.

This perspective, known as "naive realism," has been the bedrock of our intuitive understanding of reality for centuries. It suggests that objects possess definite properties independent of observation—moon can be there even when no one is looking at it—and that physical influences are "local," meaning objects can only be affected by their immediate surroundings, with no influence traveling faster than light.

The Pendulum of Reality: From Idealism to Realism and Back

The Western philosophical tradition has long grappled with the nature of reality. It began with Plato, who essentially birthed idealism—the view that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual. His student Aristotle took the opposite position, becoming the father of realism by arguing that the physical world exists independently of our perception or understanding of it.

For over two millennia, these perspectives have competed for dominance. Now, remarkably, modern physics is swinging the pendulum back toward idealism, challenging our most basic assumptions about the nature of reality itself.

Einstein's Discomfort with Quantum Mechanics

Einstein, despite his pivotal role in developing quantum theory, never fully embraced it. His famous remark, "I cannot believe that God plays dice with the universe," expressed his discomfort with quantum randomness. But his deeper concern was quantum theory's implication—as interpreted by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg—that reality itself is observer-dependent.

"I cannot imagine," Einstein once said, "that a mouse could drastically change the universe by merely looking at it."

The EPR Paradox: Einstein's Challenge to Quantum Mechanics

In 1935, Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen published a landmark paper (now known as "EPR" after their initials) designed to reveal what they saw as the absurdity of quantum mechanics. The paper presented a thought experiment that challenged the completeness of quantum mechanical description of physical reality.

The EPR paradox involves two quantum particles that interact and then separate. According to quantum mechanics, these particles become "entangled," meaning the properties of one particle are correlated with the properties of the other, regardless of the distance between them. When a measurement is made on one particle, the quantum state of its distant partner is instantaneously determined.

Einstein and his colleagues argued that this prediction of quantum mechanics violated either locality (that influences cannot travel faster than light) or completeness (that every element of physical reality must have a counterpart in the physical theory). In Einstein's view, quantum mechanics must therefore be incomplete, and there must be "hidden variables" that would restore a more intuitive, deterministic understanding of reality.

Einstein famously remarked on this paradox: "One can escape from this conclusion only by either assuming that the measurement of B (telepathically) changes the real situation at A or by denying independent real situations as such to things which are spatially separated from each other. Both alternatives appear to me entirely unacceptable."

Bell's Inequality: The Theorem That Changed Everything

The debate might have remained philosophical if not for physicist John Bell, who in 1964 devised a mathematical theorem to test Einstein's hidden variable hypothesis against quantum mechanics.

Bell's inequality theorem provided a way to experimentally distinguish between quantum mechanics and any theory that maintained both locality and realism. If particles behaved according to local realism (Einstein's view), the correlations between their measured properties would have to satisfy certain mathematical constraints—Bell's inequality. Quantum mechanics, however, predicted that these constraints would be violated in certain experiments.

Bell's proof followed the logic of reductio ad absurdum:

    1. Assume local realism (that reality is both local and independent of observation)

    2. Derive mathematical constraints that must hold true if local realism is valid

    3. Show that quantum mechanics predicts violations of these constraints

If experiments violated Bell's inequality, as quantum mechanics predicted, then at least one assumption of local realism must be false—either locality (no faster-than-light influences) or realism (objects have definite properties independent of measurement), or both.

Experimental Verdicts: The Fall of Local Realism

In 1970, with Bell's encouragement, physicist John Clauser and his graduate student Stuart Freedman performed the first experimental test of Bell's inequality. Despite Clauser's hope that hidden variables might prevail, their results aligned with quantum mechanics and violated Bell's inequality—strong evidence against local realism.

However, early experiments had potential "loopholes." The most significant was the "locality loophole"—if either the particle source or the detectors could somehow share information, the measured correlations might still be explained by hidden variables without violating locality.

In 1976, French physicist Alain Aspect proposed a way to close this loophole using ultra-fast switching of measurement settings. His group's experimental results, published in 1982, further reinforced the conclusion that local hidden variables were extremely unlikely.

The quest for ever more rigorous tests continued. In 1997, Anton Zeilinger and his team improved on Aspect's work by conducting a Bell test over an unprecedented distance of nearly half a kilometer. By 2013, Zeilinger's group had taken the next logical step, addressing multiple loopholes simultaneously.

In 2016, a team that included David Kaiser and Anton Zeilinger performed a "cosmic Bell test." Using telescopes in the Canary Islands, they sourced random decisions for detector settings from stars so far apart in the sky that light from one would not reach the other for hundreds of years, ensuring a centuries-spanning gap in their shared cosmic past. Even under these extraordinary conditions, quantum mechanics again proved triumphant.

The Nobel Recognition: A Paradigm Shift Confirmed

The experimental journey culminated in 2022, when the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John Clauser, Alain Aspect, and Anton Zeilinger for their groundbreaking experiments confirming that "the universe is not locally real." Their work had definitively shown that we cannot maintain both locality and realism—at least one must be abandoned.

Cornell physicist N. David Mermin offered a provocative interpretation of Bell's theorem. Since Bell assumes local reality, we can attribute the contradiction either to the locality assumption or to the assumption of "reality." Mermin, preferring to maintain locality, concluded that "reality must go"—even suggesting that "the moon is demonstrably not there when nobody looks."

Coming Full Circle: The New Philosophical Landscape

We have come full circle. While there may still be pockets of naive realism in classical scientific fields and among individual scientists, the overall trajectory has shifted toward a more critical understanding of the relationship between knowledge and reality.

The final philosophical battle is now between critical realism (which accepts an objective reality but acknowledges the limitations of our access to it) and various forms of idealism (which give primacy to mind, consciousness, or information in the structure of reality).

As we contemplate a universe that is not locally real, we are forced to reexamine our most fundamental assumptions about the nature of existence itself. The quantum revolution has permanently altered our understanding of reality, bringing us back to philosophical questions that have persisted since the time of Plato and Aristotle, but now informed by the remarkable precision of modern experimental physics. Perhaps our concept of "thereness" needs profound revision.

Einstein's moon really isn't there when nobody is looking at it!

More Science Posts

Take me Home